What we can learn from Microsoft

Boss, IT Business, Microsoft
1 Comment

LuigiBlogs and media alike have been on fire about opinions regarding Microsoft’s purchase of Nokia – everything from the largest trojan horse operation in corporate history to the typical armchair quarterbacking of what else Microsoft should have done. While entertaining, the true value here is the business lesson:

If you lack focus, you’ll always find something else you’re missing.

For the most successful software company.. ever.. Microsoft is at the same the worlds most insecure one. Not in a sense of IT security, in a sense of confidence in it’s people, solutions and market leadership. And it makes no sense – but it’s projected by the loud CEO Ballmer leadership to COO Turner’s frequent keynote digs at it’s competitors.

Microsoft, for as big as they are, makes the same mistakes us small business owners make all the time – lack of focus and preoccupation with the trends instead of core customer demands. When you don’t focus on delivering consistent, predictable, reliable services to your client base you end up losing their loyalty and losing their business entirely while you’re seemingly just one missing piece away from having everything figured out.

So Microsoft bought Nokia. They also bought Skype, Navision/Great Plains, aQuantive and while all generate cash for Microsoft none are projecting much of Microsoft’s core value to it’s existing client base to drive loyalty or additional business. If anything, these distractions are leading Microsoft to continue losing in all the key evolving areas to more nimble and focused competitors while Microsoft tries to be (poorly) everything to everyone.

Small business IT providers need to pay attention to these moves, to the communications and the vibe surrounding the customer perception of what is going on. Outside of Microsoft offices the company appears in peril with a lame duck CEO that is on a spending spree to save itself from a future of legacy computing while it’s competitors are building exciting products in a consumer friendly way. Microsoft says they are “transitioning” while so many of us bought their great solutions in the first place because they were incredible in the first place. Microsoft is seemingly abandoning those while telling many we just don’t know what we want from Office Ribbons to the Start bar the company is losing perspective of who it’s customers actually are for the customers it wishes it could have.

Business survival is dependent on serving the customer you have, not the one you wish you had. Subway doesn’t stop serving turkey subs because it thinks it could be selling burgers, it doesn’t put BBQ pulled chicken into a veggie sub because research shows you need more protein in your diet, it doesn’t lose it’s focus.

While every business should always work on it’s next great product/service it cannot do so at the expense of abandoning the products/services it currently provides. Microsoft has in the recent history been all-in about search, cloud, phones, tablets and is seemingly further from leading any category as it constantly loses focus over which competitor they can be better than. While consumer technology trends change as often as fashion trends, those of us in the small business IT need to remember that one of the greatest and most valuable pieces of the puzzle we bring to the solution is reliability and a sense of continuity. It is what made Windows and Office great and are to this day, while not sexy, cornerstones of the Microsoft business. We often wish Microsoft could stop losing sight of those but the lesson to be learned from Microsoft’s constant marketplace distraction is that we all seem to be chasing an uncertain future – but are we doing it at the expense of ignoring the customers that actually make up our business?

I may not be a billionaire (yet) but I will always take cash from the client that wants to do business with me today over an imaginary customer that may want to give me imaginary money tomorrow. Sure, I’ll market to them and pursue them with all my spare time, but winning in business is reflected in the bank statements.

The Breakout Moment

Boss, IT Business
Comments Off on The Breakout Moment

One of the qualities that I despise in office workers is that of mediocrity. Our jobs are not physically demanding, we’re not lifting stuff, there is no fatigue associated with sitting in an air conditioned office.. so there is no excuse for putting out shit effort and half assed stuff. Yet, I find myself doing it all the time.

The breakout moment in small business happens when you listen to your customer tell you about a service they are willing to pay you for.. and you aren’t offering it for any reason other than outright laziness.

The moment you mentally break out of thinking small & safe and start investing into big and growing is the moment all your perspectives change.

Small businesses, particularly those managed by their founders, hedge towards safety and conservatism because they are the ones that built it all in the first place. I built this shit, don’t tell me what I need to do. The problem is that this thinking is neither conservative nor safe – this unwillingness to make additional bets and diversify concentrates all the risk in the existing business lines, focuses exposure on the existing client base and anything stationary.. well.. you know.

snipSmall business is at times just a matter of a state of mind. There is nothing wrong with thinking small until you build your value, team, process and strategy. Once you’re there the breakout moment will open you up to all the possibilities you aren’t pursuing.. and if you partner up with the right people you have no reason not to.

Customers are out there, begging you to take their money.

Partner with the right people. Hire the right people. Take the money.

CompTIA Cloud Community: Trustmark Experiment

Events, IT Business, IT Culture
Comments Off on CompTIA Cloud Community: Trustmark Experiment

This blog post (and few others) will cover the takeaways from the CompTIA Cloud Community in which I participate. I am not paid for it, the following is just my opinion, not approved or associated with CompTIA in any way (as a matter of fact I think we pay for the privilege of membership in CompTIA). Either way, it’s a good activity with great insight into the IT ecosystem and I encourage you to check it out.

CompTIA (yes, the A+ people) cloud community is made up of executives from solution providers, software vendors, hardware folks and is an interesting mix of the entire ecosystem. Over the past two years we have been working together on helping find the common ground among us all and figure out how to move forward with the part of the industry that’s moving the fastest.

At the CompTIA ChannelCon we were put through an exercise that was a thinly-veiled case study for why CompTIA Trustmark for the Cloud would make sense.. and it failed spectacularly:

Half of you will stay in this room and work on the three points that IT solution partners, VARs and service providers would want from their vendor. The other half will go into the other room and come up with three points that end users / customers would need from their cloud provider / MSP / VAR.

Sounds good on the surface – find out what the user wants, find out what the MSP wants, find out where the common ground is an establish some criteria along with the ways to measure it and charge people a few hundred dollars for a CompTIA certificate. What could go wrong, right?

What went wrong

Cloud, at it’s core, is a mixture of service and technology. It’s not exclusively one thing over another which is why so many, both big and small, struggle with a way to define and a way to profit from it. Essentially, it’s the same infrastructure we’ve always had but it’s in a new location. With the new location some of the issues go away (uptime, hardware investments, scale, etc) making a way for a slew of new issues with regard to liability, compliance, business model, security delegation, etc.

The moment at which the CompTIA Cloud Trustmark shattered on the floor like a glass dropped from the top of the WTC came only a second after all the vendors came in agreement as to what the MSP/VAR/ITSP should expect from a vendor.

It came in a form of 3 different MSP/VAR/ITSP executives opening up their mouth and saying: That is not at all something we’d be concerned about when it comes to our vendors.

In a sigh of desperation, the conclusion of our group was that while the “criteria” the vendors agreed on might be legitimate it bears no value to the VAR/MSP simply because they have a different model.

For example, among the vendors were mixed mode (direct & channel) vendors, channel exclusive vendors, master MSPs and folks transitioning around. Some wanted the MSP to do everything, some wanted them to do nothing but get out the way. Some offered MDF some didn’t. Some wanted to educate the partner while others just hoped they would assume all the liability. But all vendors agreed that the partner must self qualify to work with a particular vendor.

Among the partners (MSP, VAR, IT Solution Provider) the field was even more divided: Some wanted MDF, some wanted sales training, some wanted promotion and leads, some just wanted the vendor to do their job and deliver on their promise. Furthermore, what one MSP wanted was completely irrelevant to the other and so on.

This is just the reality of the modern IT provider. When you’re small you take on more than you can chew and you need all the help you can get from your vendors even leveraging their brand name to establish your own legitimacy. But once you do have a client base and internal expertise you want a vendor that will stay as far away from your users as possible, you don’t need more competition. The further you grow the more you realize that you need to continue to focus on your core value and want to outsource or defer certain activities to someone else or even back to the vendor. Ultimately, you become so big that you figure you can do it cheaper and better in house.

It’s a lifecycle of a successful service provider. (There is also the unsuccessful service provider: Grow to the point that it hurts and then instead of overcoming the obstacles you pretend you’re the master MSP and try leading those smaller than you around the potholes until you realize you can’t scale. Then you go onto the speaking circuit and when you bomb both your business and everyone else that followed you there is more time to write a book that nobody will read and you give up your business for pennies on the dime to be a contractor at a vendor that goes boom… and then you’re an IT coach having proven failure at every level)

The conclusion of the CompTIA Cloud Community

… was that there is no conclusion on how to effectively identify, qualify and standardize cloud service providers or their services. What everyone was clear on was that cloud is a service and that one size does not fit all so it becomes even more important to work closely with the people that you can trust, evaluate, visit and build a business model with. Trustmarking people on service turns out to be a lot more complex than checking whether they know a difference between an ATX case and a toaster.

Truth of the matter is that there are certifications that service providers go through (from organizations folks have actually heard of) and actual standards we all adhere to that take a very rigorous look at both the business operations, technology implementation, financial data handling and more – everything from PCI to ISO to SSAE16 – are gruesome in depth audits that every serious service provider must go through but they all asses and certify a small piece of the process and activity.

The cloud – as a mixture of both service and standards – is so broad that to build a certification process around it would make it so elaborate and broad that it would make it virtually useless.

Important thing to note here is that the value of CompTIA Communities, as I’ve often heard assessed incorrectly in conversations with people that are not a part of it, is not in printing certifications. It’s in the venue and conversations with other like minded executives that are truly on top of their game. To my knowledge, there is nothing else other there that provides this extensive of a reach in our industry so to those that have preconceptions about the communities based on the organization and what it did a decade ago… I encourage you to join in the conversation.

Business Of Technological Change

ExchangeDefender, IT Business
Comments Off on Business Of Technological Change

For as long as I’ve been in the IT business (which at this point is roughly more than half of it’s existence, since the rise of commercial Internet) our jobs have been those of implementing change. Implementing networks, servers, devices, mobile networks, security of everything involved, cloud, compliance and regulatory reporting, whatever is next. In a sense, we were lucky to have huge barriers to entry with huge costs and skill requirements that perpetuated $100/hr+ billable rates and allowed many to build highly sophisticated, highly profitable businesses.

But somewhere along the way people forgot how they got there. I remember traveling the country, speaking to conferences and groups about the cloud and the higher up I went the message more often missed than hit. I spoke to pretty much all the HTG groups and one illogical and insurmountable objection was always: “I make $2,000 immediate profit selling this Cisco switch, why would I ever want to kill that with the cloud?” – though to be fair to HTG, I also got a lot of calls after their clients got taken over by Microsoft and they got shown the door: The reason you talk to your clients about technology, regardless of whether you believe in it or not, is because that is your single most important value: expertise. You don’t have to profit from it, or sell it, or endorse it – but ignoring it doesn’t mean your clients will not hear about it from someone else. Honestly, many conversations on this same topic to this day go like this as I talk to more and more MSPs dealing with despair and cloud defeat:

Marginalized business is still a business. A business that generates less revenue and more profits beats unemployment – every day. The sooner you change, the more profits you get. It’s pretty simple and far easier than banging your head against the wall.

Change is not for everyone.

Business ownership and management is not for everyone.

But people who don’t like their business, don’t like the direction of technical change, don’t like managing technology and people.. this is not an industry for you. The name of my company is Own Web Now Corp. Our biggest product a few years ago was a SPAM filter. If your sole business today was SPAM filtering you’d probably be sitting at your desk trying to figure out how to throw yourself out of the window and land on a VC manager or a Bellini brother because that’s the only way you’re going to make money in the IT world dealing with obscure and dated technology. So believe me, I understand what some of you are going through – but I absolutely do not understand why you’d continue: technology business requires innovation and constant pursuit of what the clients are asking for.

The Good News

The good news for the army of Robin Robbins Clipart Marketing Lemmings is that the last inch of “customer service” when it comes to technology is not going to be taken over completely by Apple, Microsoft, etc (maybe by Comcast or Brighthouse or Cox) because big boys have no intention of going into a business to provide technical solutions – they just want to sell their junk.

This will remain the strongest piece of the SMB IT just because of the nature of SMB: Things don’t just get thrown out in a month because Apple came out with a new iPad. People don’t just start running their business on Surface just because of stupid commercials with clicking sounds. The prospect of integrating new technology with old technology is something that likely has at least half a decade in the bottle.

On August 28th we’ll be announcing something that will give our partners a huge advantage in the marketplace. Make sure you are there. Make sure you act on it as fast as humanly possible.

Now anyone who has read this blog for more than a month can read through this and see that we’ll offer branded support. So yeah, you’ll be able to offer solutions and have someone else take care of the client but that’s not really a big deal. It’s the other stuff that I’ll explain – that will give those of you with some marketing skills and willingness to grow – a way to grow very rapidly and do so without a huge investment up front.

P.S. Of course, if you don’t work with us or haven’t worked with us in the past please don’t even bother registering – they’ll just kick you out…

Folks, here we are – we’ve built the networks, we’ve built the cloud, we’ve established the key relationships and for the most part worked out all the kinks and issues in the delivery chain. Now is the time to grow and talk to your clients and your community about the technology solutions they will be using. Good luck trying to sell them on SBS 2014 or Office 365 – they don’t need you for that and that’s the conversation you’ve already lost.

But… if you think about what is actually holding many of you back from growing your business, and where ExchangeDefender can provide scale, it’s actually pretty simple.

I need help with the remote control

Uncategorized
Comments Off on I need help with the remote control

I really could use some help here friends: I need a friendly remote desktop sharing component to integrate with our support solution, a join.me of sorts, that works on Windows and iOS. Not Java based.

We are currently using a proprietary ActiveX control that deploys a VNC server on the target system and only allows connections to our repeater server in the cloud. The support guy can request a session, target machine picks up the request and through the repeater VNC infrastructure opens a remote view and control session between the two.

We have successfully used this in the Unicorn but with some of the new stuff (and frankly, with the rapid demise of the RMM companies) we’d like to expand the portfolio and create a freebie remote tool that we can just give away to our partners. We’re good on Windows though I’m open to alternatives – I got nothing as far as the Mac goes which I’d love to have and mobile of course is a crapshoot.

If you know of such a solution – or if you’re willing to license yours without a per-user model since we will have no accounting – please contact me at vlad@vladville.com

Thanks!

The case against RMM

IT Business
Comments Off on The case against RMM

I’ve certainly written my fair share about the RMMpocalypse and you’ve proportionately flooded my mailbox regarding the need for such a tool. I admit, the deadpool of the RMM consolidation is not in a significant way an indication of a dying MSP business – it’s just that the MSP business is transitioning towards the cloud and value proposition is well… what I’ve blogged about for years. At the same time we have an RMM-like product in the ExchangeDefender portfolio and I’ve gotten countless emails similar to this one:

“When can we have a conversation about the Unicorn? I know it’s not on the same level but you’re one of the last places left that actually cares about partners and I need a long term solution.”

So far I’ve declined all such calls because even though the Unicorn will get a major update this quarter, it is not going to be an RMM.

Community Service or Business

Vladville is community service.

User group presentations, community presentations, podcasts, etc are a form of community service.

ExchangeDefender is a business. Structurally speaking, it’s a software business – we spend a lot of money to build a solution and get paid over the long term. And long term business case for management of PCs and servers is bleak at best.

Business Issue

There are less and less MSPs.

There are more and more types of devices to manage.

Those are opposing forces that make a financial model for building an RMM platform extremely difficult. The worst part? That’s not the bad news.

The bad news isn’t in the fact that there are fewer people to sell the software to or the fact that it would cost more and more to produce a management platform that covers Windows, Mac, Android, Windows Phone, iOS, Blackberry (ha!).. No, the bad news is this:

Development of an RMM platform to centrally and neutrally manage devices is against the business model of OEM device makers who are less and less likely to open up the API to third parties that may eat into the potential profits.

Microsoft, Apple and Google do not want developers that marginalize their platforms. The major brokers – Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and every other mobile operator – want the service, warranty and management business. With the developer not allowing you access to the device and the carrier/provider fighting you for the service, where do you take the RMM platform?

This in fact is the reason you’ve seen what you’ve seen with the RMM industry – it’s not that it’s consolidating, it’s that it’s a feature with a large deployment base that will never get any bigger and it’s maximum value is what it’s worth right now + any additional business it can generate as a part of something bigger.

Come to Jesus Meeting

Guys, I love you. I do. I appreciate everyone that gives me money. Building an RMM solution would not be doing you a favor. If you want to hurt yourself there are more thrilling ways that will at least make you feel like a real man in the process:

148299587PB003_FIESTA_DE_SA

Instead of spending time trying to figure out another RMM, another scripting language and another way to pursue the shrinking and more difficult market.. Please. Just stay with what you got, keep the money printing machine stuck in legacy mode and keep on cashing it in as long as the clients are willing to pay.

But if you’re going to put some time and effort into a major business initiative (like switching an RMM platform) for the love of god call me. Let’s work on something that is actually growing, creates additional ways to provide consulting and implementation revenue, let’s talk about something that the industry cannot get enough and let’s talk about the stuff that is positively impacting MSP opportunities.

Let’s talk about the cloud. Before your competition does. Your vendors are already bombarding your clients – profit from the momentum, don’t fight it.

MSP vendors are like a box of chocolates

IT Business, Rant
Comments Off on MSP vendors are like a box of chocolates

88FBB5FA92C94D0E9B19750B374B10C7Another RMM & PSA business.. poof. Except this time they didn’t even bother putting up an elaborate lie about “becoming more competitive, better resources, nothing will change” – instead a hand written “Please flush twice” sign.

But hey, it wouldn’t be Dell if they didn’t class up the joint and find another way to kick the industry that should have passed it up a long time ago.

For the rest of the “barely breaking even, raising another round, Vlad you’re too harsh on VC, this is how real business works” crowd – you’re left out in the sun.

While printing virtual shares more worthless than the paper they are on is a good way to motivate employees too dumb to realize you’re not going public, the reality of business hasn’t changed much but the fundamentals are lost on many.

The reality of business hasn’t changed in 3700 years – ever since the Egyptians came up with the concept of zero – your business either made more or less than breakeven. And if you make less than 0 all the fancy BS is just lottery.

Meanwhile at the trade show

Step on up folks, step on up.. Get in tighter, who is feeling lucky tonight?

monte

Find the vendor, find the vendor, find the RMM vendor that won’t be out of business next month!!!! Oooo, tough break! How about you sir, can you find the fastest dinosaur?

What the IT media at large is finding out is what people in the SMB IT have known for years – there is no future in automating what Microsoft and Apple are automating a deprecating away on their own. While these tools and MSP value concept was easy to explain in 2003 when stuff would go down all the time and needed constant surgery to keep spyware and viruses at bay, in 2013 – more than a decade later – that business model is worthless. Some people are just waking up to the fact that value propositions have to change over in order for value to be converted into profits.

People have poked fun at the so called apocalyptic writing on the wall for years on Vladville but let me ask you this: What is an antispam company worth in 2013? Don’t answer that yet. Now say you were an investor in such technology (that is rapidly marginalized and given away for free by virtually everyone) – would you be putting in more money in it or hoping someone dumb enough walks by with a bucket of cash and walks away with it before it’s completely worthless?

This is the cycle that the MSP vendor industry finds itself in right now. Too many single point solutions, too much debt, too little integration and business development that focuses on what businesses are actually buying.

While point solutions still have a place, and will still be sold, their competitive value has been marginalized by innovation and they can no longer stand on their own. For most of these things their best chance is to be lumped into something more cohesive or given to someone that can actually put a meaningful business model around them that can compel small businesses to buy it or sign up for it for free in order to sell more profitable, more popular solutions. You can’t take Shockey Monkey seriously because a version of it is free? I can’t take you seriously if you are too stupid to figure it out.

The game.. the business.. doesn’t change because the vendors cannot stay in business. But it changes all the time and if you refuse to change with it, all you’ll be left with is change.

ExchangeDefender Beyond IT

ExchangeDefender
Comments Off on ExchangeDefender Beyond IT

Last week we held a major webinar to cover the developments at Own Web Now since last Thanksgiving. The webinar was oversubscribed but the recording is up and if you have any questions there are people here that would love to answer them. Long story short, we had to look at the mirror and face the fact that we are growing the business at a rate that just was not sustainable – so we ended up reengineering not just the services but also the management and how we do things. Check out the webinar:

ExchangeDefender Q3 Update

http://www.exchangedefender.com/media/ExchangeDefenderUnified.wmv

Note: It may require GoToMeeting codec if you don’t have one; skip the first few minutes, GoToMeeting crashed and had to be restarted.. hence my rather annoyed tone at the start.

Now why does this matter to you at all? Well, on the surface it really doesn’t. Our internal process, our certifications and our business compliance are our problem.

But since we’ve solved those problems.. we can now offer a lot more services. Hence, I’m happy to invite you all to our next webinar that I hope you attend (don’t bother if you aren’t in our partner program and actively reselling services):

Wed, Aug 28, 2013 12:00 PM – 1:15 PM EDT

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/343852577

Announcing the release of the ExchangeDefender for Service Providers. If you manage large teams or diverse technology deployments, ExchangeDefender is adding solutions to the portfolio that will dramatically reduce the amount of time you will spend managing that technology and making support and deployment services remarkably more profitable.

letsgoHooray, more crap Vlad wants to sell me!!! No. What we will be announcing will not be an additional charge, will not be a new product and will not be something that is new to you.

However, it will put thousands of dollars into your pocket during the first month or on the very first project. Gua-ron-tee-d.

So let’s rock.

Do you really need a tablet?

Apple, Microsoft
Comments Off on Do you really need a tablet?

In the last quarter the shipments if iPad cratered. Microsoft lost a billion dollars so far ordering Surface tablets that nobody seems to want and about everyone that needed a cool Netflix interface either already has one or has options from the double digit Android tablets to high convertibles.

But do you really need one?

The business argument for this one is actually fairly straight forward, tablets tend to be seen as consumer devices and the “need” for the tablet is kind of limited. At least that is what I have heard from my peers. When you need to actually do a lot of work you will get it done on a PC with multiple monitors, when you need something done on the road you have a laptop and everyone is already carrying a smartphone that can do a lot of quick stuff on the go.

With the full Windows 8 laptop prices dropping below the cost of tablets and the battery power coming closer and closer.. It is harder to make the case for tablets.

However…

Our industry has always had a part time workers in technical sense. Those that never needed two screens, or DVD burners or card readers.

There is a very large industry of terminal PC devices and accessories. For those, full PC is just not necessary, no matter how cheap. The maintenance costs of a PC are still significantly more expensive than those of the tablet.

Finally, your line of business apps are being built for touch and go, not for sit and double screen. This piece alone, I think, continues to drive the development and adoption of tablets and retirement of laptops as we go along.

The convertibles… I have no idea. The part I cannot overcome is the size – 10″ laptops suck and tablets larger than 10″ are too bulky and annoying. Keeping them in a single device, in an awkward implementation, that gets the best and worst of both along with the top price will likely just leaves it as an edge solution that will not get a lot of traction.

Just my tale on the subject but it will ultimately be decided by Apple and whatever hackjob Microsoft halfasses as a response to it.

If you spell checked this maybe people would take Vladville more seriously

Blogroll
1 Comment

From the fanmail:

Hi Vlad,

I hope you read this in a positive light.

I love your blog and you have a lot of insight that isn’t available anywhere else. You’re obviously a smart guy so why not proof read things before they get published or have someone check them for you? I think a lot of your thought provoking work would get significantly more consideration if it was written more professionally.

Dear Fan,

Perspective is Everything

1014049_10151746879284885_1331118748_n

I do not proofread, I do not spell check and unless Bill Gates puts the red squiggly line underneath the word as I’m typing it, I don’t even blink.

Sometimes as I’m writing, the bottom of my thumb slips down onto my trackpad and I start typing stuff in the middle of the paragraph above the one I’m currently writing. Sometimes I correct it, sometimes I keep it in there as a part of my insanity plea just in case I ever get sued for libel.

But why, why Vlad? Why not proofread? It’s simple. Part of the charm, part of the appeal, part of the attraction is that the thoughts offered here are as profoundly honest as I would be if you bought me a few drinks. This is perhaps why so many people read it and self identify themselves in my writing – it touches the nerve that only direct stuff typically does.

If I were to spell check that, consider the sentence structure, format my posting to meet any particular agenda or cover my ass on the oft chance that I’d offend someone.. I’d be doing this all day and I’d never publish a single post because anything you say will be offensive to someone. If I were to cut out all the potentially offensive and “unprofessional” content this blog would be left with .com. Plus, I have no respect for people that are only professional to my face and turn into little bitches a second later, we all get pushed out of middle school for a reason.

There are tons and tons of blogs in the IT space… and nobody reads most of those past the headline.

Reading a channel blog about industry development from someone who has never participated materially in the industry is the equivalent of reading the organic chemistry college textbook for fun. I don’t write headlines as a means to sell advertising, I don’t write for people that don’t want to read and frankly, I do not see a professional angle as being something that will ever come to Vladville (not in a sense of ad sales, not in a sense of whoring myself on the conference speaking circuit, not in a sense of having this stuff published, etc). Others have that as the agenda and I wish them the best of luck, many of them are my friends, it’s just not for me.

Like I mentioned yesterday, there comes a time where you seriously have to ask yourself what you stand for and what you actually believe. If you’re OK swallowing the lies, dishonesty, deceitful behavior and obvious manipulation just because it’s wrapped in a pretty wrapper with a good Christian bible quote next to it then by all means, go for it. But there is a difference between doing something good and pretending you’re a good guy. If I have to take Vladville and dress it up into something just to get attention, frankly, I’ve failed.

So thanks for reading Vladville, hope you like it and hope you have a great weekend. And if not, that’s cool too, go fuck yourself.

Love,

Vlad