Vlad Mazek – Vladville Blog

Both NY Times and Engadget are very excited about the Dell’s attempt to redo the Mac Air. If this is true that’s relatively interesting development in the right direction:

Now, let’s for a moment put aside the fact that I’m a pretty big Dell fanboy.

You see, just today study covering Apple announced that it’s PC market share slipped 0.5%. For a company in the single digit percent market share, half a percent is an awful lot. In a  time when for the first time ever, more notebooks were sold than desktops?

What gives?

Clouds, beautiful clouds.

More people than ever are buying small, underpowered Netbooks. One of the more incredible solutions from Apple is the Macbook Air, the supposed thinnest notebook ever. Without a CD/DVD. Without a bunch of connections. Without a bunch of accessories. The very first device that isn’t shamelessly trying to provide a destkop experience in a smaller laptop form factor.

Who could this possibly appeal to?

Perhaps the people that are no longer looking for a ton of processing power on the desktop. Or the laptop.

Even XP got to extend it’s life.

So again, let’s ask ourselves, what gives?

Let’s review. Microsoft building the cloud. Google building the cloud. Amazon building the cloud. Computer manufacturers building devices that are betting most of the grunt work will be done on the applications and services delivered across the Internet.

About the only person still not convinced this is front and center as a technology development are accounting geeks that are bad at figuring out the costs of running a business. But you know who is good at determining the value of technology?

Folks spending money on IT. What are they buying you ask?

iPhones. Blackberries. Netbooks. Ditching traditional infrastructure for the cloud. Like the software developers building the cloud solutions because the market demands them. Like the IT solution providers that are building solutions around the cloud because the market demands it.

It’s tough out there, right? Goodbye huge up front investments. Goodbye days or months to roll out a solution. Goodbye being chained to the desk. Goodbye expensive business Internet connections – your cell has 3G. Goodbye “migration strategies.” Goodbye business application patching. Goodbye computer guys keeping things running with duct tape. Goodbye complicated migration plans. Goodbye unfair licensing.

Things are different out there. And people are voting with their wallets.

In the IT space we are famous for starting religious wars. Mac vs. PC. XP vs. Vista. To see the level of unity we have between solution providers, solution developers, solution integrators and now computer makers is just incredible. It is a truly remarkable time to be in this business.

When I first opened doors to my Atomic Tangerine office in Downtown Orlando I had planned to move most of my home office in there. Long story short, you’d be surprised how quickly office space disappears when you add people to it! So later this  year when the lease expires we’ll be moving to a bigger office in Orlando.

Now, this is part my laziness part poor planning and part unwillingness to look at the stages of my business I’d rather not see again. Like the ghost of IT business marketing past I sat through the old marketing gimics, flyers, registration cards, business card ziplock bags and more unopened software than a flea market warez dealer.

I’ve through out equipment that I recall costing thousands upon thousands of dollars that by today’s standards belongs in the museum. Almost sentimental type of stuff, like the first Cisco wireless AP bridge. Business cards from when I first started my business. Business licenses from 1997.

Though I probably need to spend one more weekend back there to disassemble all the crap and throw away all my books that I will never need to reference again, I’m pretty confident that I will now at least have some place other than my couch to work from. TV lineups are a bitch.

So who cares, right?

Well, there is a point in all this. The point is that there is no such thing as a “I don’t have a time to run a business” if you intend to survive. There is only deferral, letting things pile up until you’re forced to waste far more time, energy and effort to compensate for what you should be doing all along.

As 2008 comes to a close, what have you let just slide this year that you can fix and get straightened out over the next week and a half?

I’m writing this blog post at about 25,000 ft in a half empty plane heading to Dallas for a company party. With a ticket I bought yesterday, with a hotel and car rental for well under $500. Last year I would have paid that much for the flight alone. My biggest concern this year? Where to take my growing team in Orlando for the Xmas party.

I’m reading the latest BusinessWeek article (p. 64) titled: “The recession: What Top CEOs Are Thinking” and much like the rest of the magazine, it’s full of doom and gloom. One of the interesting questions is “What will it take to get the economy going again?” Here is what Dennis Dammerman, Former GE Vice Chairman has to say:

We’ve got to get consumers and business spending again. I think we’ve proved over the years that investment tax credits and faster depreciation increase equipment spending. For consumers, confidence is key. And while I don’t agree with much of what Barack Obama wants to do, I think that for a great chunk of our consuming public, he has improved that confidence. I hope this enthusiasm doesn’t die.

<randombs>This is one of the arguments I frequently have with my business friends when it comes to the chicken-egg conundrum. Does business investment in technology and solutions create jobs which increase employment, salaries and discretionary spending of the employees improve the economy? Or does the tax refund and economic incentive program put the money in the hands of consumers around which businesses spring up to collect the money and churn? Most business owners prefer to serve the demand for products and services because it’s far easier than creativity and funds that are required to generate the sense of need for the product! There is a huge difference between the two and it’s important to realize it because it drastically changes the type of a business you run and how you sort your priorities. Does most of your money go into advertising or R&D?</randombs>

For over a year now, many of my close friends and I had this long running argument about the economic downturn which has become a recession which is now heading for a depression. Those who chose to ignore it or not play a part in it are now suffering or have long shut their doors. Let me be clear on one thing: You don’t have the benefit of ignoring the markets. You can choose to believe that the economy is doing fine and pursue your direction of building a quality business that deserves a premium rate and can effectively market the benefits of your company over another. You can also choose to believe that economy is doing poorly and you focus on building a cost competitive business that can generate volume over slimmer profit margins.

What you cannot afford to do is to do nothing. Your ability to serve your market is contingent on that markets existence. Turn on the TV and you will see specific industries bitching and moaning about their prospects because their market virtually vanished due to the circumstances out of their control. Those who saw the signs and responded are now thriving and will emerge much stronger when and if the economic outlook becomes more positive.

What am I doing?

Around the middle of this year we had no choice but to discontinue several of the high margin products because our data center providers were running at capacity and the space utilization and power cost continued to skyrocket. With space and power at a premium there is no way to build cost-effective solutions, so you focus on being the best.

What a difference a few months make. The other day I was offered a 3 year contract from a major bandwidth provider for bandwidth at $5.80/Mbit. Data centers which previously housed companies that embraced riffraff are now gone and there is suddenly a deal to be made. Quality hardware is cheaper than ever and the companies that specialize in equipment salvage and off-lease gear have warehouses nearly packed. Not to mention that the last thing Dell wants is to spend more on shipping the off-lease equipment that’s about to be sent to them – Can we make a deal?

Now only if I had some expertise designing large-scale IT infrastructure…  Wait a minute!!! I did see a tweetie bird!

My point is..

That entrepreneurial jackasses do not see up and down economic cycles, they see the opportunity to create a business model that serves new found demand. The reason OWN has continued to skyrocket is because our solutions are built with the things people really want but don’t necessarily want to pay for it and build on their own.

I see 2009 developing a new market, the hagglers market. No middle man, no compromise, no bundles and no contracts. Just hit my card and let me get back to my business. Our business plan for 2009 was finalized last week and we are aiming to launch 4 new products in 2009 (one per quarter) that fill the demand on the extremely price conscious segment of the midmarket. The midmarket is ripe for services and we’ve shaken that tree all year long enough to notice that there is a polarization of sorts – high service and utilization vs. low cost self-service model.

Until now, we haven’t had a good answer for the bargain hunters and hagglers. Now we will. What about SMB? Frankly, we expect that to continue going downhill as there are less fish in the pond but also less, savvy fishers.

Every day I field calls from people who have a ton of demand and are just trying to fill it. My job is to come up with the solutions that answer that demand, and in 2009 I will have another company that is a damn near opposite of the one I have today. I do not believe one will erode the other as the markets self-identify the solutions built for them. Whatever they choose, it will lead to more money for me and more leads for my partners. And an MBA for my monkeys. And a Corvette ZR1 in every color 😉

If you have any ideas given the above, you know where to find me and how to work with US.

Previous post was about the importance of change in the survival of enterprise.

But the last few months in America have been the celebration or at least massive reinforcement of failed business plans. From the banking and financing failures all the way to the auto industry bailouts and power corruption we are parading the panic of not being able to admit that things as they are do not compete.

So instead of changing… we’re just going to pour more money into something that failed and expecting it to change? How?

You know what I am really surprised at? That nobody from the newspaper and magazine industry has come up to ask for a bailout. The industry that has suffered the most by far has been the specialized and “breaking news” coverage a day or a week or at times a month later. Turns out here are better, more trusted, more enjoyable and more timely way to get information, even with a lot more variety. Even in our little SMB space, the trade rag has jumped the shark and been reduced to a few pages of ads coated in some self promotion (I guess that’s all that’s left when you take out Microsoft whoring) and that’s the one that hasn’t all but disappeared.

Are we seeing any of these industries making significant changes? When you look at it, most of the newspapers and magazines aren’t designed to spread information and provoke you to think (like Harvard Business Review for example) but to provide the bare minimum of relevant coverage to whore out as many pages to the advertisers as possible. The same hit that the newspapers got from the web is now being felt by the online media. Let’s face it, when you lose touch with your audience and only look at your ad revenues and focus on maximizing it instead of serving your audience…. what happens to your audience?

Same goes for the banking and credit industry.

Same goes for the auto and transportation industry.

They have lost their touch with the people and the consumers of their products. As a result, their products have started to suck and put more distance between their clients needs – there is no better example of this than US Airways noting that it will now charge it’s passengers for water! As Jay Leno mentioned last night: “the oxygen masks are now coin operated.”

You cannot resurrect bad ideas with more money.’

Sometimes though, it’s more comfortable to prolong the pain than to come to terms with failure/death. Every year, every December, every company needs to have a honest look at itself and its numbers and find out what to do with it’s disappointments.