Bzzt. Are you sure you want to be that stupid?

Shockey Monkey
4 Comments

Ever wonder what happens at intersection of stupidity and far too much spare time?

People always ask me why I named the product Shockey Monkey. To some the title is downright offensive! Truth is, over the course of the workday people forget to read and need to be shocked back into the correct behavior. When I decided to write Shockey Monkey I didn’t just need a tool to streamline operations, I needed a system that fixed stupid with every fiber of its being.

I have a dream.. brothers and sisters.. that one day my staff will read the screen and not need me to sit around and manage them. Until that day, bzzzzt.

So what’s the general problem we have when working on tickets in an unmanaged scenario? We often ask who is working on the ticket. During the day as requests are coming in fast and furious and people are running back and forth across multiple offices/shifts it’s hard for one person to manage the entire operation. In my mind, the support team should work as a “team” and tag the requests as they go along.

That way, you know who is working on what and you don’t double up the effort.

So, welcome the Tag feature to Shockey Monkey. Right on the update ticket header you will see a new Checkbox, AJAX enabled and all. Just hit it if you want to tag the support request or start typing in the box below and it will automatically do it for you!

bzzt1

Here is what it looks like after the support request gets tagged.

bzzt2

Now, let’s say you’re opening a support request, how do you know if anyone is working on it? Well, if the Tag checkbox is there, you’re the first one with the right to take a crack at it. If it’s tagged by someone else you will see the warning, in this case red Alert: Tagged by Vlad Mazek.

bzzt3

This is where the bzzt shock really comes into Shockey Monkey. Let’s say you aren’t reading the screen. The moment you click on the textarea to try and update the support request the giant hand of Vlad reaches down from the sky with a tazer in one hand and shocks you into reading the screen.

bzzt4

Bzzt! You’ve been shocked!

I had even thought of adding a disable string to the action chain but decided against it in case the tag was made by someone who just left for the day or had something far more urgent come up.

Now you may ask…

But Vlad, why not just take away the ability to update the ticket if someone else tagged it?

You don’t work with people, do you?

Here is what happens when you take people’s ability to do something: They keep on clicking on it, refreshing the page, checking the battery in their keyboard, adjusting the wireless keyboard sensor.. everything but reading the damn screen. They might even open up Communicator or email/call and ask about it and then I’d have to rip their f’n head off and beat them to the point that they can only move their hand around enough to read braile encoding that says why don’t you read the f’n screen you idiot politely explain to them how the “tag” feature works.

So Karl, yes you can hire the right people. Yes, you can develop the standard for your people to follow. But if you don’t have a taser to enforce the standards and practices in realtime and fall back to personally standing over their shoulder or obsessively beating down monkeys only after they have made a mistake, buddy, you’re going to run out of people.

Karl’s process and Vlad’s adaptive learning… the new era in IT monkey accountability. Tag it before you work it. Read or be shocked.

Adventures in Packing, Minifying, gzipping and iPhoning

Shockey Monkey
4 Comments

I have a few days to kill before we officially start selling Shockey Monkey v2 (waiting on Windows Mobile application to be completely bugless) and I figured I’d sit down and work on Shockey Monkey performance a little.

Good news. No page under Shockey Monkey requires more than 1 second to render, with most actually rendered in under 0.3 seconds.

The network utilization is a whole different story unfortunately. You see, all the pretty AJAX interface and usability functionality comes at a cost. Roughly 400 Kb worth of uncompressed Javascript type of a cost. To give you an idea of why this is a problem: imagine refreshing the support request display give times. You would have downloaded 2 Mb worth of Javascript. Not good at all.

So one of my tasks this weekend was to figure out a way to reduce that burden. The first problem was that of multiple requests. Between my own and third party Javascript I had eight Javascript files, meaning eight requests to the web server. Since IE and Firefox only use a maximum of two requests to the server this meant that the browser would request, load, request, load, request, load… and make you pull your hair as you watched the loading bar bounce around.

I first started with trying to combine my Javascript on the fly which resulted in a learning experience that packed Javascript code cannot be combined. FMR.

I finally ended up uncompressing all of my Javascript and minifying it in a single Javascript file. Here is the before:

packitup

Notice it took nearly a second for the combined request to pull down all my Javascript files. But with minification and a single script:

afterminify

Notice that after minification and consolidation the Javascript library has gone from over 400 uncompressed, to 340 compressed, down to 142 compressed and minified! The total download and render time from nearly a second down to 1/5th of a second! If I put my marketing hat on, that’s 500% improvement!

So a page with 168 support requests, live code and effects including autocomplete and all the other good stuff is yours in 2.38 seconds.

I have two items remaining in the to do list. First, enable gzip compression on the server even more. Second, find out why Javascript is not being cached. Currently I am trying to cache Javascript code at 1 month:

<IfModule mod_expires.c>
ExpiresActive On
ExpiresByType application/x-javascript “access plus 1 month”
</IfModule>

But not making it very far with that one, yes the module is loaded and available.

As far as the iPhone is concerned – app works flawlessly over Safari even the visual effects are all there. As for release, any day now folks…

Between a rock and a cloud place

Microsoft
3 Comments

It’s Friday… time for something lighter.

There comes a time in every businesses lifecycle when it has to realize that it has been surpassed. That is the challenge of running a technology company. You try to lead and run with one leg but the other leg is dragging you back with all your relationships, legal woes, criminal behavior and the blood of enemies. In such times you have to figure out what is the best thing for you to do. Stand still and make the best out of your circumstances or try to run and hope that nobody digs too deep and sees beyond the marketing.

Earlier today Sarah and I chatted for quite some time about the challenges Microsoft sees today in the marketplace. Sarah was on SBS Show #20 (hey, we should do one of those together again!) and has a very popular blog, is a writer for RWW.. she is by no means perfect: she carries a Blackberry and is a huge fan of Mesh. And as some of you are aware, my opinion of Mesh is:

Microsoft Mess: Translucent blue theme for FolderShare combined with a rather crippled version of logmein.com functionality, sprinkled with missing features, beta tags and overall admission by Microsoft that it cannot compete in Web 2.0

Sarah feels that this is a double standard.

Of course it is!

I don’t know about you, but I tend to hold a $60 billion a year software company to a higher standard than a Silicon Valley startup with three dudes and a gfx d00d in the basement. But that’s just me.

Is it fair that people distrust Microsoft while completely falling head first in love with everything that Google does? Of course it isn’t fair, people should not be distrusted just because they are convicted felons with lawsuits over anticompetitive behavior across every continent except Antartica.

Is it fair that Microsoft is being slammed for their S+S move and going more direct? Of course it isn’t fair, but the people complaining are the ones that played a major part of that $60 billion dollar a year business.

So what can Microsoft do?

That advice is going to cost a few million dollars.

But I’ll tell you how Microsoft is going to continue to fail in its efforts until it can look in the mirror.

Microsoft wants to compete in the new world with the old tools.

It wants to find friends in the new places but it’s new friends don’t want to hang out with its partner base.

That’s the darn truth.

Microsoft wants to be relevant in the Web 2.0 world but it wants to bring over all the baggage of its current tools and systems that the Web 2.0 generation rejects.

Microsoft wants to compete with Gmail with Exchange. That doesn’t work. Exchange is too cheap (for partners to resell at a wage that sustains their business) and too expensive for people that want a free solution.

The consumer and business isn’t wrong. They have options for free and while most cannot hold a candle to Microsoft in terms of feature set, they may be good enough to get the company up and running.

But surely after company grows enough it will need Microsoft tools, right? Right? They will need a server, they will want to invest money, they will try to clean up and.. right? Well, let’s look at Microsoft’s main competitor to Vista. Is it Linux? LOL. Is it Mac OS X? Oh, it’s Windows XP? You mean to tell me people will just take something that works over the latest and greatest that doesn’t even though its several generations ahead of everything else on the market in terms of security?

That is the part that Microsoft is scared about.

Microsoft knows that when a company chooses a platform it takes a lot of effort to get them off it. Why do you think they constantly gloat about how many Notes deployments they took over? Why do you think they keep on harping on Oracle so desperately? Because they want the platform.

Google either doesn’t make or loses remarkable amounts of money in its many properties simply designed to get you to click on ads. They are an ad company.

Apple, in their own right, is now the king of mobile computing. iPhone gives them a platform for applications that no other company has.

So where is Microsoft? They are not a consumer favorite. They are not a bleeding edge favorite. They are not a very stylish or cool company. They are a business solution.

As far as business solutions go, they are the best.

But Microsoft’s failure, and ultimate undoing, is that it is at its core a company that wants to dominate everything. It cannot settle for being second best. It cannot settle not to own the defacto standard and concede that to PDF, it cannot accept Flash everywhere so it must come up with Silverlight, it just cannot tolerate one ounce of competition.

And now Microsoft finds itself at the crossroads.

We are the defacto leader in the commercial software space.

But our client’s don’t want that.

And in its effort to be the biggest, best, first and only solution everyone should ever consider for anything, Microsoft finds itself making more enemies and less and less friends.

That is not a company or a climate that I would bet on.

Microsoft can continue to exist as the best and biggest software company that makes business solutions. Microsoft can even design the online application suite that works and draws users to them slowly.

But Microsoft shareholders are not patient.

Microsoft management is not patient.

Microsoft made $60 billion in revenues last year. Google just cracked $5 billion yesterday. Microsoft is jeopardizing its $60 billion company to curb the dominance and rise of the $5 billion company that only exists to sell ads and systems to support those ads.

Can Microsoft and it’s shareholders be happy with the $60 billion a year? How quickly will we see a call for the change of management at Microsoft as they keep on losing the share of their cash cow and become less and less relevant in the Web 2.0 ad cloud?

michaeldouglaswallstreetcolor

Microsoft lacks leadership and Microsoft Mess proves that – instead of something new and fresh at the core it’s same old Microsoft – crippled acquisition, feature and functionality incomplete until Version 3.0, poorly integrated across the range of current applications but a big promise of SDKs and a plea for someone to please pay attention to it.

“The point is, ladies and gentleman, the greed – for lack of a better word – is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms — greed for life, greed for money, for love, knowledge – has marked the upward surge of mankind.”

It also served the upward surge of Microsoft and got it to $60 billion a year.

But will Microsoft realize that it now needs to change…. because as motivating as the quote above is, the guy who said it ended up in jail and lost it all. Will Microsoft?

Making the world a safer place $20 at a time

OwnWebNow
Comments Off on Making the world a safer place $20 at a time

We’re now up to the fifth podcast in the OWN Partner Call series and joining me today is Dana Epp, CEO of Scorpion Software. Dana has been on our SBS Show before and as the Microsoft MVP in Security he is no stranger when it comes to the podcasts, blogging and SMB Conferencing in general.

So why should you bother to listen to the nearly 50 minute long discussion over TFA/OTP?

Because we sat around and had a security sales conversation. Learn how to intelligently discuss the security without fear mongering your clients, establish it as a point of differentiation and give your clients the flexibility of adding the extra level of security one user at a time. With customers always being reserved towards arming their entire staff with the latest and greatest gadgets, security does not have to fall into that category – Dana and I partnered up to bring a fully managed AuthAnvil solution at $20/month per employee.

Yes, $20.

Think you can make money offering that?

Now think about my spin on this – I’m now the only one able to offer cloud services with two factor authentication forever ending the paranoia of “But if it’s on the Internet anyone can look at it, right?”

Oh, and its being built into Shockey Monkey. Quick, does your PSA have integrated two factor security? So that thing you keep your passwords, customer credit cards, remote VNC access to the clients portals.. anyone that can sniff your password has access to it?

Year in the making folks, we’re here to kick some booty, stop playing around and pour some jet fuel onto your marketing. What in your offering makes you any different than the 200 other indianinabucket.com resellers in your city? I’ve got a whole stack of things, are you interested? AIDA!

Download it, listen to it, think about it

Time to build your own bridge

Microsoft
20 Comments

Folks, I have done as much as I possibly can for you to communicate your concerns to Microsoft. We’ll see what happens. However, I have a job to do and I don’t have much more time to spend on this so I’m going to give you some leads and let you communicate your pains directly to Microsoft.

You should first start by getting in touch with Steve Ballmer (CEO), Kevin Turner (Chief of Operations) and Allison Watson (Partner Program)

If you are an SBSC or Small Business Server focused contact the two ladies below:

Andrea Russell
Small Business Specialist Community
Andrea.Russell@microsoft.com

Aanal Bhatt
SBS/EBS Parner Marketing
aanalb@microsoft.com

If you have feedback specifically about how the SBS/EBS product group can help you ask Kevin:

Kevin Beares
SBS Community Manager
kbeares@exchange.microsoft.com

If you’d rather talk to a partner and you’re scared to talk to Microsoft directly:

Partner Area Leads
https://partner.microsoft.com/US/40011087
Mark Crall, USA
Vijay Riyait, UK
Travis Hilton, AU

And to see if any of your feedback is making any change in direction keep an eye on this blog, Steve is the go-to guy for S+S:

Steve Clayton
Microsoft S+S Evangelist
http://blogs.msdn.com/stevecla01/
Twitter: @stevecla

Here is where we stand right now:

Microsoft has decided that this is the direction they are going, partners be damned (or however you interpret 6% commission for handing over your clients to them) there is more money in fighting with Google than working with partners on a premium solution.

For the partners side, you guys are angry, dismayed, betrayed and aren’t going to take it anymore. One of the people I respect a whole lot in this space said it the best: “I am not going to mention or allow any solution that takes my customers away from me.” So partners will build a wall from Microsoft.

As for me, I have done all I can even though it isn’t my job. I have not received a Cease & Desist letter from Microsoft and since a pr0n scene with a Microsoft logo is about as low as I can go I don’t have much more to add.

I’ve done my best to eloquently voice the pain that you have expressed to me, I have been told that it is what it is and it’s as good as it gets (masked with some mocking and patronizing) so if you have the time to pursue it further for the greater good of our community please follow the contacts above.

I have summed up why I think this stalemate is bad for us all, but at the end of the day I have a job to do and it’s not fixing Microsoft and it’s partners. I’ve done all I can for you folks, try the shrimp and tell them Vlad sent ya.

Lucy’s Sail: Day 6: Password is "Password1234!"

OwnWebNow, Security
1 Comment

Son, you have to earn the pimp hat. I am not sure how young you have to be to start moving software but Tim is getting an early start: effective immediately Own Web Now in partnership with Scorpion Software is bringing you safer small business computing.

One person at a time.

At $20 a month.

Complex? See below.

timmytokens

Game changer? You bet. Where do you sign up? Here.

Passwords are the most frustrating thing for system administrators and MSPs to manage. Make them too easy and you get hacked. Make them too difficult and the staff complains, forgets their password and opens trouble tickets which eats into overall profitability and security of the organization. We can fix that!

With Scorpion Software AuthAnvil and one time password authentication you are issued a token, a keychain, with a constantly rotating short password. When you try to login into your organization you are prompted for your password but you are now also prompted for another password which you copy from the security key. This allows clients to have simple passwords and passphrases and never worry about being hacked with a password that was compromised, guessed, keylogged on a kiosk or sniffed over the air. For $20/month per employee you have one less thing to worry about!

We are partnering with Scorpion Software to make this affordable.

We are doing it one person at a time. Yes, just one. Got a small client where only one or two people travel and need additional security for SBS Remote Web Workplace? You can get it one at a time!

We are integrating this into Shockey Monkey and ExchangeDefender.  We are working with Scorpion Software on integrating this into Exchange 2007 and will have discounts for the companies that subscribe to the above services.

Most importantly, we are making this EASY. We will configure the service for you. We will install and deploy the configuration. You can use it on any server or as many servers as you want to. Going forward, you will have ability to use the same technology with other popular services including some you will see on this very blog 🙂

I told you we’re changing the game. OWN is here for you, what are you waiting for?

What is the partner problem with Me S+S?

Microsoft
4 Comments

I’ve spent the better part of last few days talking with partners, working with a few of my Microsoft friends and trying to make sure they don’t get fired for knowing me, trying to get to the bottom of why the Me S+S is perceived as something that is not good for us.

Go ahead and throw the axes and feces this way, yes, I told Microsoft where they messed up and how to correct it. The bottom line is that we all compete at a certain level but we also win tremendously when we all play along and do what is in the best interest of the customer. We have to find a way to work together on SMB solutions – that in fact is the reason I am unhappy.

Question: Why is Vlad upset about this, he’s being handed gold hand over fist with Microsoft pegging their compensation at 6% while his partners get 10x the storage, can mark up the solution 50-200% without blinking (yes, most our 10GB Exchange hosting is sold at $15-$30/mbox) and they get their branding and control of the client too. Why is he raising a stink over this?

My primary concern is my business. Always. My second concern are my partners, people who make my business possible by offering our solutions and helping us build solutions that their customer base is demanding. With what I think is close to 20,000 partners at OWN it is my responsibility to bring up their concerns. They don’t like S+S.

I am upset over S+S because it makes me look bad for confirming partner suspicions that Microsoft is not to be trusted. So for years as the MVP, as the vocal supporter of the SBSC, as the advocate of using Microsoft software I am now seen as someone that sipped the koolade and sold out the SMB partner base to Microsoft.

I am upset over the way S+S was pitched because it used the word competition about 5,000 times during the keynotes. I have spent years to communicate to this channel that cloud is a complementing technology that can make sense for some customers and that there is a decent business to be built on top of it. Microsoft just came out and effectively said “This is the future, suck it. You can be a part of it or go wash cars”

Finally, I am upset over S+S because I know what my partners are going to do about Microsoft suddenly playing in their back yard. They will throw the anchor out, build walls around their business and their customers, consider Microsoft competition and the feedback train stops there. This is bad for all of us – partners, slimy vendor whores (me) and Microsoft. Instead of working together we are now protecting our own turf. How exactly are we going to win? Make no mistake, partners see Microsoft as their competitor now. By association, so am I.

Question: What should Allison Watson say/adjust in time for Australian WPC and TechEd?

Dear Microsoft, ever noticed how none of the partners seem to have a problem with Google? Ever notice how none of us pay attention to them and use them for search, advertising, shopping, even gmail.com? Ever wonder why that is?

It’s because we as Microsoft partners do not compete with them.

We as Microsoft partners have a larger software portfolio, far more functional and integrated software, pricing and licensing options, ability to design custom solutions that really fit the clients needs. That in fact is how we become the trusted advisors that Microsoft urges us to become.

Now when you jump on stage and use the word compete over and over, declare that you will win, I know you are talking about your competition with Google, SalesForce, Apple, and so on. But guess what, we do not compete with those companies as Microsoft partners! We use Google search appliances. We sell and manage Apple computers – for gods sake even you write Microsoft Office and cloud solutions for that platform!

You need to be aware that when you talk about competition to your partners whose entire business is built on the on-premise solution, your competition is with your partners. You are perceived to be devaluing your solutions and while offering them to the same market that we serve you are competing with us.

Many partners I have spoken to feel that Microsoft has taken the software solutions that partner currently have their businesses and their clients businesses built on, and packaged them into $10/month S+S pitch.

So let’s review customer options – $10/month/mbox or $5,000 for the server, $300/month for the ongoing MSP fees, antivirus and thousands more for the migration work… How is a partner going to win in a price conscious market?

It’s not a problem when Google comes up with Apps because that is a consumer play and those customers will eventually come to partners when they need the power of Microsoft applications. It’s not a problem when Apple comes up with Me because that is a consumer play all the way that will never result in a Microsoft partnership.

It’s a huge problem when Microsoft comes out with S+S because it offers the same tools, our services, our value proposition, our go to market strategies and undercuts them by a factor of 100 or more.

How can a Microsoft partner win when you are perceived to be against their best interests?

How can you expect to have any partners if your partner conference is a giant announcement that you intend to compete with the people sitting in the room?

Question: Well, it’s the future so how do we soften the blow?

Be more cognizant of who your partners are.

Who in their right mind thought that a Walmart story was a good cherry on top of the keynote that announced head-to-head service offering that will compete with the mom and pop partner businesses in the audience?

Most Microsoft partners I know, as a matter of fact almost all of them, are small businesses. Small businesses that until this point saw Microsoft as a big manufacturer and promoter of their industry. Last week Microsoft just put up a huge Walmart sign in every neighborhood around the world that says “Lower Microsoft Prices. Always” in the minds of Microsoft partners and promised that Microsoft will win!

To take analogy a little further, the businesses that used to partner with MicroMart are now it’s competitors. The MicroMart partners that will win in this business are the ones that will work as MicroMart’s vendors in building it’s warehouses, producing it’s marketing and opening up little nail salons and Dollar Tree stores right next to it. All the mom and pop partners that currently exist will either turn into Jiffy Lube oil change car chop shops or try to serve a luxury clientele.

I’m sorry Microsoft, but how exactly did you figure that was a good idea?

Cleaning up the Microsoft Me S+S

Microsoft, OwnWebNow
4 Comments

Why is it that people only seek to open up the community channels, ask for feedback, have an ongoing conversation and attempt to win hearts and minds after they have launched a nuclear assault?

In case you have been out for the past week, last week Microsoft made an announcement that due to the pressures in the marketplace from Google, Apple, SalesForce and others it has to change it’s business model to be direct with the customer. While traditional business model will still be there, Microsoft will push for more and more direct business.

On the face of it, this is nothing new as Microsoft has already competed in consulting with Microsoft Consulting, as well as direct financial and licensing relationship with the customers with Software Assurance and Microsoft Financing. The new angle in the conversation pertains to the Microsoft offering ongoing services to the client which rightfully entitles them to fully managing the client, marketing solutions that compete with the current technology or support provider, bringing in their preferred partners instead of the ones currently in the account, etc.

Was Microsoft simply foolish when they came up with the S+S model that effectively destroys their partner community? Microsoft is a lot of things but they are not fools. In the process of pricing and designing services you look at what your competitors are doing.

I was put through the same cycle of advisory blindness when Google purchased Postini. “But boss, they are advertising their prices on their homepage with one-click purchase, can’t we do away with the partner program application?” In short, no, because we are a partner company.  Somehow people failed to remind Microsoft of that when they me S+S ed up their strategy. I’ll tell you exactly what they did – they looked at the Google Apps or SalesForce and thought:

“You know what, instead of pushing this through Volume Licensing that requires a lot of paperwork why don’t we just do what Google does and we’ll even one up it, we’ll give them 6% commission for just doing the referral. Let’s face it, nobody that is interested in this will work with the partner anyhow, and they get a few bucks out of every conversation so we can go direct and be partner friendly at the same time!”

Where Microsoft lost it’s partner community in the me S+S is in the fact that we know their business and their business practices better than they do. We know how Microsoft markets. Sign up for a few newsletters and they give you a few more. One group pushes another and the TechNet subscription offering with an enticing free software offer comes up in the sidebar. Soon even Microsoft Action Pack and MPAN find their way into the newsletter. Coincidence? No, just trying to break into the account with a Microsoft solution. Genius. Want to see how this plays out for you when you recommend or offer Microsoft solutions?

Microsoft owns the client. They need to stay in touch with them and offer them valuable services of course. Why not use the opportunity to upsell?

    Click here to buy Vista Ultimate, now 30% less!!!

Partner just lost a licensing deal. Microsoft should also be an active participant in the community. So it should naturally invite it’s customers to local events where material can be tailored for the customer that is not managed by a partner.

    See how easy customizing CRM is? Let’s do a quick marketing blitz!

Partner just lost on the advisory fees, consulting and perhaps further sales. But what is the ultimate exit?

Growing? Need local servers? Need managed services? Want help with migration from Lotus Notes or SalesForce? Well check this out, our partner locator. Which ZIP code do you live in sir?

Quick question, who climbs to the top of the partner locator? The partners who take clients best interest and recommend software and solutions that make sense and not ones that collect the most PAM and Microsoft Partner Program Points? Good night.

Let me repeat: Microsoft is not a fool. They know what they are doing. They likely have a ton of metrics and numbers to justify the fact that the SMB consulting space should not exist beyond a certain level. To an extent, I agree with them in that and have written extensively on how you can avoid falling into the dinosaur herd.

Microsoft made a fatal mistake in it’s direct approach because it showed it’s hands.

No number of adjustments to the course is going to make partners feel easy about the long-held suspicion that Microsoft is after our clients. They just came out and confirmed those fears, laid down the rules of the game, pegged the partner value at 6%, dictated ownership of the client and the right to do with them as they please.

Where does this leave you? Well, you could jump the crocodiles from one solution after another and hope to stay one step ahead of Microsoft as they move all their applications to the cloud and make the on-premise or partner solution unprofitable or unjustifiably expensive.

Does the significance of the problem make sense to you yet?

Does it now make it painfully clear why I’ve written so many sharp articles bashing the mindset of SPF and riffraff? Did you listen to me all this time that I’ve been waning you about the impact the SMB space will feel as the complexity of the solution spectrum goes away? Do you now understand the value of having a business over a specialty and a passing hobbyist interest in making a sustainable wage without taking it seriously? For your sake, I hope it did. You may not enjoy every picture and agree with everything I say, but if I were out to screw you do you really think I would waste all of my time talking to you about it? How do you like me now? Still afraid to call and talk to the big bad evil Vlad? Have you made your decision yet cause the clock is ticking… the only thing that has changed is that you don’t have to blindly trust me anymore because the cards are on the table.

Lucy’s Sail: Day 5: Canadian Berries

OwnWebNow
3 Comments

If you are a man or a woman hoping to have children, don’t look down 🙂

Do we offer Blackberry? No. Why? Well, for starters I think BES is the biggest piece of s*it software ever written combined with the dumbest network implementation ever. Canada should be forced by NATO to apologize for RIM and be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Anyone purchasing a Blackberry should be profusely beaten with it, strangled with its cord, then have it wrapped in barbwire and showed straight up their candy …

Will we ever offer it? Yeah, over my dead body.

Vlad recently went for a swim in the Pacific:

killvladlq

Deal!

Own Web Now Corp proudly announces immediate availability of BlackBerry Enterprise Server 4.1 on our global enterprise-class Exchange 2007 network. In addition to availability from European Union, United States of America and Australia, the widest shared Exchange 2007 network now offers customers the choice and flexibility over their own mobility platform. Own Web Now platform for communications now includes 10GB Exchange 2007 mailboxes, SharePoint 2007 and mobility solutions powered by Windows Mobile 6, iPhone 2.0 and BlackBerry Enterprise Server.

Yes, I’m on FriendFeed

Awesome, Friends
Comments Off on Yes, I’m on FriendFeed

Succumbing to peer pressure, I have setup a FriendFeed account. For the voyers among you, here you go:

http://friendfeed.com/vladmazek

Personally, if you want to chat I’d rather you either email me (vlad@vladville.com) or MSN IM me (vlad@vladville.com) but if you’re on the Friendfeed crack I’m right there with you.

I have to note though that I find the amount of information this site delivers quite disturbing. I tied in a few of my services and if you follow the trail line you can probably guess what I had for lunch from it too along with a full dental record. My god, that is a lot of information available completely anonymously and it even sucks all my friends in too so you can tell exactly the kind of relationships I have with people. Scary. I guess I’ll have to curb my habbit of ordering brides on eBay and befriending little girls on MySpace in light of all this! Damn it! And I just got good at it, too!